Revised 06 August 2018. |
Public domain. |
|||||||
• Home • |
||||||||
In
those days around September 22nd, 1962, I spent a long time with my
ear glued to the radio expecting to be evaporated at any moment. My
house in Asmara (Eritrea) was less than
a couple of kilometers away from Kagnew Station,
the most important strategic communication center of the American Armed
Forces between the Atlantic and the Pacific oceans. These were the days
of the Cuban Missile Crisis and nuclear war seemed inevitable; Kagnew
Station, I thought, would have been a primary nuclear target. When,
sometime in the mid 1980s' I first typed on an Amiga 1000 these pages,
I was living in Vicenza,
Palladio's home, and less than a kilometer away from the American Military
Ederle Camp aware that Vicenza
was a primary strategic nuclear target where not even a single cockroach
would have survived in the event of a nuclear conflict. Beautiful Italy,
all way down from north to south, houses several strategic targets which
are surely mapped for at least a good megaton thermonuclear bomb. The
clear indication that the Italian government is mostly made up of a
group of imbeciles (I am Italian) is that instead of trying to diminish
these threats and getting rid of foreign military presence on its soil
it is increasing it. If Vicenza at the time could anticipate a megaton
bomb with at least an additional one on its outskirts (Longare Base),
a few years later it was worth at least an additional one with the new
American Military Installation in its airport, viz., Dal Molin. The
psychological pain of a nuclear holocaust probably was more felt in
those years, prior to the fall of Berlin's Wall, however the threat
is still lingering and something might get out of hands from those enlightened
brains of the world's politico-military elite and plunge our beautiful
planet in cinders, smoke, pestilence, death and, quite likely, a long
nuclear winter.[1]
With tens of thousand nuclear weapons, [2]
each ready for a planned target, [3]
writing something like "Surviving the Day After" is sheer
nonsense since a limited nuclear exchange can hardly be envisioned while
the deadly effects an all-out nuclear exchange would not spare any part
of the planet. However, the data presented in this pamphlet is quite
instructive; as such it might help to increase the number of anti-war
lobbyists in a possibly doomed planet. As I write these lines, today is the 73rd anniversary of the atomic blast over Hiroshima, on a planet with rampant misery and a failing ecosystem, uncountable billion-dollars have been gambled away by those mad MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) and deterrence insanities and uncertainties remain, even if great and smaller international crisis have been overcome leaving dormant tens of thousand fantastically more powerful "Little Boy" and "Fat Man". Should we be optimistic since they are everywhere and ready to be abruptly woken up at the push of a button? In their silos; cruising under the oceans inside nuclear submarines; aboard military fleets and in the sky on strategic bombers and, always on the alert! Worst of all, we still have all powerful paranoiac warmongers [4] among us opposing disarmament and constantly seeking increased and more sophisticated armaments. Although the proclivity to use the bomb has been tamed they may still miscalculate or act wildly. This is the real danger. |
||||||||
1
- "... the long-term climatic effects of a major
nuclear war are likely to be much severer and further-reaching than
had been supposed. In the aftermath of such a war vast areas of the
world could be subjected to prolonged darkness, abnormally low temperatures,
violent windstorms, toxic smog and persistent radioactive fallout-in
short, the combination of conditions that has come to be known as
"nuclear winter." The physical effects of nuclear war would
be compounded by the widespread breakdown of transportation systems,
power grids, agricultural production, food processing, medical care,
sanitation, civil services and central government. Even in regions
far from the conflict the survivors would be imperiled by starvation,
hypothermia, radiation sickness, weakening of the human immune system,
epidemics and other dire consequences. Under some circumstance, a
number of biologists and ecologists contend, the extinction of many
species of organisms-including the human species, is a real possibility."
(“The Climatic Effects of Nuclear War.” Richard P. Turco,
Owen B. Toon, Thomas P. Ackerman, James B. Pollack and Carl Sagan.
Scientific American, August 1984.) |
||||||||