Go to Original
The Planet Can't Wait
By David Ignatius
The Washington Post
Wednesday 08 March 2006
Climate change is real and must be addressed now.
The warnings are coming from frogs
and beetles, from melting ice and changing ocean currents, and from
scientists and responsible politicians around the world. And yet what
is the US government doing about global warming? Nothing. That should
shock the conscience of Americans.
Actually, the Bush administration's
policy is worse than doing nothing. It has resisted efforts by other
nations to discuss new actions that could reduce emissions of carbon
dioxide before the global climate reaches a disastrous tipping point.
And it muzzles administration scientists to keep them from warning about
the seriousness of the issue. The administration's position is that
more research is needed - and then, as evidence grows that humans are
adding to global warming, it calls for still more research.
Congress is no better. Most members
apparently are waiting for permission from lobbyists and campaign contributors
before getting serious about climate change. The McCain-Lieberman bill
to cap emissions languishes in the Senate; Pete Domenici, the powerful
chairman of the Senate Energy Committee, has issued a white paper calling
for ideas for legislation, but there's no word when a bill might emerge
from his committee. Meanwhile, the Senate environment committee is also
claiming jurisdiction. So what we have in the Senate is a turf fight.
And don't even talk about the House. Maybe members would get interested
if they thought Dubai was behind global warming.
Giant corporations such as General
Electric and Citigroup have concluded that global warming is real, and
they are beginning to mobilize their resources to do something about
it. This business activism may offer the best hope of moving government
off its duff. I asked Tom Donohue, the head of the US Chamber of Commerce
and one of Washington's savviest political operators, when he might
commit his organization's considerable clout to taking action on this
issue. He's still in the "needs more study" mode, but he added, "When
the time is right, we'll be as helpful as we can." Hey, Tom, the time
is right.
Every week brings new evidence that
global climate change is real and that it's advancing more rapidly than
scientists had expected. This past week brought a report in Science
that the Antarctic is losing as much as 36 cubic miles of ice a year.
Last month researchers reported that glaciers in Greenland are melting
twice as fast as previously estimated. One normally cautious scientist,
Richard Alley, told The Post's Juliet Eilperin he was concerned about
the Antarctic findings, since just five years ago scientists had been
expecting more ice. "That's a wake-up call," he said. "We better figure
out what's going on."
Animals don't have the luxury of ordering
up more studies of global warming. Andrew Revkin of the New York Times
reported in January that colorful harlequin frogs found in Latin America
are dying at alarming rates because of a fungus that seems to be linked
to global warming. Doug Struck explained last week in The Post that
climate change is helping the ravenous mountain pine beetle devour forests
in British Columbia, killing more trees than wildfires or logging. Similar
findings are stacked in a depressing pile in my study that keeps getting
taller.
And now we come to the Bush administration
- the folks who once warned that it would be folly to wait so long for
evidence that the "smoking gun" might be a mushroom cloud. Their spirit
of vigilance was applied to Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, which
turned out not to exist - but not to climate change, which does. In
a meeting in Montreal last December, the chief American delegate, Harlan
L. Watson, got so peeved about a proposal for new global "mechanisms"
to carry out the 1992 Kyoto Protocol that he walked out. The American
side relented after the wording was softened to "opportunities," and
there's now at least a hope for future talks about talks about global
warming.
But woe unto any administration official
who becomes so concerned about global warming that he actually tries
to sound the alarm. James E. Hansen, the top climate scientist at NASA,
found that political minders at NASA headquarters had ordered a review
of his lectures, papers, interviews and Internet postings after he called
for quick reductions in greenhouse gas emissions to ease global warming.
A 24-year-old former Bush campaign worker who allegedly had been involved
in efforts to muzzle Hansen later resigned - after reports surfaced
that he had fudged his résumé.
Usually, America's political antics
are forgivable, but not on this issue. As evidence grows that human
activity is accelerating dangerous changes in the world's climate, the
Bush administration's excuses for inaction are running out. History
will not forgive political leaders who failed to act on this issue,
and neither should voters.
Go to Original
Rain Forest Gets Too Much Rain,
and Animals Pay the Price
By Hillary Rosner
The New York Times
Tuesday 07 March 2006
San José, Costa Rica - Eduardo Carrillo
was on a field trip to Corcovado National Park with a group of his biology
students last November when he realized that something was wrong. In
just over a mile, the group found five dead monkeys.
Three more were in agony, he said later
- emaciated, near death, sitting on the forest floor unable to climb
a tree.
"I had never seen something like this,"
said Dr. Carrillo, a wildlife ecologist at the University of Costa Rica.
At first he suspected yellow fever, which swept through monkey populations
in the 1950's. So he hurried back to San José, the capital, and convened
a team of scientists, which included wildlife biologists, a microbiologist,
a geneticist and a veterinarian.
Tourists in the park, a relatively
remote 212-square-mile tropical rain forest preserve that stretches
along the Pacific coast and inland, reported sightings of other dead
animals, including deer, toucans, macaws and sloths.
In mid-November, park officials closed
Corcovado to visitors after tourists, despite warnings not to handle
wildlife, began bringing sick animals to ranger stations in the hope
of saving them.
Dr. Carrillo and his colleagues, as
well as government officials, worried they might have a mini-epidemic
on their hands. But tissue samples from Corcovado spider monkeys - Costa
Rica's most endangered species of monkey - sent to a laboratory at the
University of Texas for analysis showed no evidence of a virus or other
pathogen.
The story of what really happened in
Corcovado, or at least the prevailing theory, is less worrisome in the
short term than a disease outbreak, but it has the potential to be deadly
serious.
Costa Rican researchers think the affected
animals starved to death because of a lack of available food sources
and an inability to forage for food during several months of extreme
rain and cold.
September, October and November brought
excessive rainfall, nearly twice the monthly averages, and unusually
low temperatures to many parts of Costa Rica, especially the Osa Peninsula,
which juts into the Pacific in the south.
Corcovado averages about 24 inches
of rain in September, 31 inches in October and 20 inches in November.
In 2005, more than 39 inches fell in the park in September, 59 inches
in October, and 41 inches in November.
While it is impossible to know if the
weather in late 2005 is related to climate change, the Costa Rican team
studying Corcovado worries that if the climate changes and produces
more extreme weather events like this, animal populations may not bounce
back easily, said Gustavo Gutiérrez-Espeleta, a wildlife population
geneticist at the University of Costa Rica.
The weather caused several problems
for the monkeys. Some fruit trees did not bear fruit during the rainy
months. Others produced fruit but it fell to the ground early, leaving
nothing on the trees for long periods of time.
Compounding the problem, researchers
say, was that monkeys were unable to look for food because of the incessant
rain.
"If you have a long period of days
where it's raining, raining, raining, they just stay in the tree waiting,
and they don't eat," said Grace Wong, a wildlife conservation researcher
at National University in San José.
"The monkeys need sun to dry off,"
said Ronald Sánchez Porras, an ecologist at the University of Costa
Rica. "You can see in the tree when the monkey moves his body to try
to shake the water off. But when it rains like this, it's impossible."
Four species of monkeys live in Costa
Rica, and all four are found in Corcovado.
The squirrel and capuchin monkeys rely
on a diet of fruit, insects, leaves and stems; howler monkeys mainly
eat leaves. The spider monkeys consume a diet almost exclusively of
fruit, leaving them the most vulnerable.
Spider monkeys in Corcovado also appear
to have very low genetic diversity, said Dr. Gutiérrez-Espeleta, the
wildlife population geneticist.
"I've been finding that when we measure
genetic variability, the spider monkey is the worst in Costa Rica,"
he said.
Dr. Gutiérrez-Espeleta said he believed
that a genetic bottleneck might have occurred several years ago among
Corcovado's spider monkeys, leading to reduction in their genetic diversity.
In addition to being hungry, the monkeys
that died were severely dehydrated, apparently having been unable to
venture down from the trees for water.
This may have stressed their immune
systems to the brink, causing parasites and infections that occur normally
to become deadly.
Feces collected from the park showed
elevated levels of usually benign parasites, a sign, Dr. Guttiérez-Espeleta
said, that the animals' immune systems were not functioning properly.
Animals living near the edges of the
park or outside the park in nearby privately owned rain forests seemed
to fare better than those living deep in the park, probably because
they had access to fruit trees and other crops planted by people.
"I never saw toucans here before, but
they were fighting outside my office because we have banana trees,"
said Marleny Jimenez, who owns the Drake Bay Wilderness Resort, a tranquil
getaway at the headwaters of the RÃo Agujas, about five miles up
the coast from Corcovado.
At Bosque del Cabo, a 650-acre private
rain forest preserve and eco-resort at the southern end of the Osa Peninsula,
also near Corcovado, most of the property's fruit trees did not bear
fruit during the excessive rains, said the proprietor, Kim Spier.
"We have also noticed that we had many
more animals, especially monkeys, than usual that were trying to get
into the kitchen or our fruit storage area to steal food," Ms. Spier
wrote in an e-mail message.
While some estimates hold that as many
as half the spider monkeys in Corcovado died in the last few months
of 2005, the scientists cannot be certain, in large part because it
is not known exactly how many animals live in the park.
The Wildlife Conservation Society and
Conservation International provided money for research into the animal
deaths and will pay for follow-up visits to the park every other month.
Researchers will then tag monkeys to
keep tabs on troop populations and mark trees to monitor fruit production.
"The lesson is that we should document
as much as possible from now on with this kind of event and try to establish
a link to the climate change process," said Carlos Manuel RodrÃguez,
Costa Rica's minister of the environment and energy.
For several decades, Costa Rica has
had a strong record of natural resource protection, with strict rules
on what sort of resource extraction is allowed on private lands.
The country uses a gasoline tax to
pay landowners for "environmental services" provided by forests on their
land, like watershed protection, greenhouse gas mitigation, biodiversity
and scenic beauty.
"Costa Rica is committed to reversing
the process of climate change," Mr. RodrÃguez said, citing the
country's rain forest preservation efforts, ban on oil drilling and
interest in renewable energy.
"We don't see the rest of the world
doing a good job," he added.
Corcovado's starving monkeys, the Costa
Rican scientists worry, may be early messengers of future problems associated
with a changing climate.
"It's proof," said Ms. Wong, the wildlife
conservation expert, "that sometimes we can establish a national park
and say, 'We're taking care of animals here,' but the situation is out
of the control of humans." |