Editor's Note: T r u t h o u t presents
two stories on nuclear power here. The first, "Land of the
Dead,"
from the UK Guardian, is an excerpt from a book of horrific
accounts
of survivors of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster that occurred
on April
26, 1986. The second article is a pro-nuclear editorial
published
in today's Washington Post by John Ritch, the director
general of
the World Nuclear Association. Mr. Ritch declares that
nuclear power
is the only answer to the twin crises of energy supply and
global
warming, and he asserts that opponents of nuclear power are
motivated
by "unscientific prejudice." In light of the ongoing
nightmare in
Ukraine and Belarus, readers are invited to draw their own
conclusions
about Mr. Ritch's use of the term "unscientific prejudice."
Chernobyl
Land of the Dead
Go to Original
The Guardian UK
Monday 25 April 2005
On
April 26 1986, the No 4 reactor at the Chernobyl
power station blew apart. Facing nuclear disaster on an
unprecedented
scale, Soviet authorities tried to contain the situation by
sending
thousands of ill-equipped men into a radioactive maelstrom.
In an
extract from a new book by Russian journalist Svetlana
Alexievich,
eyewitnesses recall the terrible human cost of a catastrophe
still
unfolding today.
When a routine test went
catastrophically
wrong, a chain reaction went out of control in No 4 reactor of
Chernobyl
nuclear power station in Ukraine, creating a fireball that
blew off
the reactor's 1,000-tonne steel-and-concrete lid. Burning
graphite and
hot reactor-core material ejected by the explosions started
numerous
other fires, including some on the combustible tar roof of the
adjacent
reactor unit. There were 31 fatalities as an immediate result
of the
explosion and acute radiation exposure in fighting the fires,
and more
than 200 cases of severe radiation sickness in the days that
followed.
Evacuation of residents under the
plume
was delayed by the Soviet authorities' unwillingness to admit
the gravity
of the incident. Eventually, more than 100,000 people were
evacuated
from the surrounding area in Ukraine and Belarus.
In the week after the accident the
Soviets poured thousands of untrained, inadequately protected
men into
the breach. Bags of sand were dropped on to the reactor fire
from the
open doors of helicopters (analysts now think this did more
harm than
good). When the fire finally stopped, men climbed on to the
roof to
clear the radioactive debris. The machines brought in broke
down because
of the radiation. The men barely lasted more than a few weeks,
suffering
lingering, painful deaths.
But had this effort not been made,
the disaster might have been much worse. The sarcophagus,
designed by
engineers from Leningrad, was manufactured in absentia - the
plates
assembled with the aid of robots and helicopters - and as a
result there
are fissures. Now known as the Cover, reactor No 4 still holds
approximately
20 tonnes of nuclear fuel in its lead-and-metal core. No one
knows what
is happening with it.
For neighbouring Belarus, with a
population
of just 10 million, the nuclear explosion was a national
disaster: 70%
of the radionucleides released in the accident fell on
Belarus. During
the second world war, the Nazis destroyed 619 Belarussian
villages,
along with their inhabitants. As a result of fallout from
Chernobyl,
the country lost 485 villages and settlements. Of these, 70
have been
buried underground by clean-up teams known as "liquidators".
Today, one out of every five
Belarussians
lives on contaminated land. That is 2.1 million people, of
whom 700,000
are children. Because of the virtually permanent presence of
small doses
of radiation around the "Zone", the number of people with
cancer, neurological
disorders and genetic mutations increases with each year.
Lyudmilla Ignatenko
Wife of Fireman Vasily Ignatenko
We were newlyweds. We still walked
around holding hands, even if we were just going to the store.
I would
say to him, "I love you." But I didn't know then how much. I
had no
idea.
We lived in the dormitory of the
fire
station where he worked. There were three other young couples;
we all
shared a kitchen. On the ground floor they kept the trucks,
the red
fire trucks. That was his job.
One night I heard a noise. I looked
out the window. He saw me. "Close the window and go back to
sleep. There's
a fire at the reactor. I'll be back soon."
I didn't see the explosion itself.
Just the flames. Everything was radiant. The whole sky. A tall
flame.
And smoke. The heat was awful. And he's still not back. The
smoke was
from the burning bitumen, which had covered the roof. He said
later
it was like walking on tar.
They tried to beat down the flames.
They kicked at the burning graphite with their feet ... They
weren't
wearing their canvas gear. They went off just as they were, in
their
shirt sleeves. No one told them.
At seven in the morning I was told
he was in the hospital. I ran there but the police had already
encircled
it, and they weren't letting anyone through, only ambulances.
The policemen
shouted: "The ambulances are radioactive stay away!"
I saw him. He was all swollen and
puffed
up. You could barely see his eyes.
"He needs milk. Lots of milk," my
friend
said. "They should drink at least three litres each."
"But he doesn't like milk."
"He'll drink it now."
Many of the doctors and nurses in
that
hospital and especially the orderlies, would get sick
themselves and
die. But we didn't know that then.
I couldn't get into the hospital
that
evening. The doctor came out and said, yes, they were flying
to Moscow,
but we needed to bring them their clothes. The clothes they'd
worn at
the station had been burned. The buses had stopped running
already and
we ran across the city. We came running back with their bags,
but the
plane was already gone. They tricked us.
It was a special hospital, for
radiology,
and you couldn't get in without a pass. I gave some money to
the woman
at the door, and she said, "Go ahead." Then I had to ask
someone else,
beg. Finally I'm sitting in the office of the head
radiologist. Right
away she asked: "Do you have kids?" What should I tell her? I
can see
already that I need to hide that I'm pregnant. They won't let
me see
him! It's good I'm thin, you can't really tell anything.
"Yes," I say.
"How many?" I'm thinking, I need to
tell her two. If it's just one, she won't let me in.
"A boy and a girl."
"So you don't need to have any more.
All right, listen: his central nervous system is completely
compromised,
his skull is completely compromised."
OK, I'm thinking, so he'll be a
little
fidgety.
"And listen: if you start crying,
I'll
kick you out right away. No hugging or kissing. Don't even get
near
him. You have half an hour."
He looks so funny, he's got pajamas
on for a size 48, and he's a size 52. The sleeves are too
short, the
trousers are too short. But his face isn't swollen any more.
They were
given some sort of fluid. I say, "Where'd you run off to?" He
wants
to hug me. The doctor won't let him. "Sit, sit," she says. "No
hugging
in here."
On the very first day in the
dormitory
they measured me with a dosimeter. My clothes, bag, purse,
shoes - they
were all "hot". And they took that all away from me right
there. Even
my underwear. The only thing they left was my money.
He started to change; every day I
met
a brand-new person. The burns started to come to the surface.
In his
mouth, on his tongue, his cheeks - at first there were little
lesions,
and then they grew. It came off in layers - as white film ...
the colour
of his face ... his body ... blue, red , grey-brown. And it's
all so
very mine!
The only thing that saved me was it
happened so fast; there wasn't any time to think, there wasn't
any time
to cry. It was a hospital for people with serious radiation
poisoning.
Fourteen days. In 14 days a person dies.
He was producing stools 25 to 30
times
a day, with blood and mucous. His skin started cracking on his
arms
and legs. He became covered with boils. When he turned his
head, there'd
be a clump of hair left on the pillow. I tried joking: "It's
convenient,
you don't need a comb." Soon they cut all their hair.
I tell the nurse: "He's dying." And
she says to me: "What did you expect? He got 1,600 roentgen.
Four hundred
is a lethal dose. You're sitting next to a nuclear reactor."
When they all died, they refurbished
the hospital. They scraped down the walls and dug up the
parquet. When
he died, they dressed him up in formal wear, with his service
cap. They
couldn't get shoes on him because his feet had swollen up.
They buried
him barefoot. My love.
Sergei Vasilyevich Sobolev
Deputy Head of the Executive
Committee of
the Shield of Chernobyl Association
There was a moment when there was
the
danger of a nuclear explosion, and they had to get the water
out from
under the reactor, so that a mixture of uranium and graphite
wouldn't
get into it - with the water, they would have formed a
critical mass.
The explosion would have been between three and five megatons.
This
would have meant that not only Kiev and Minsk, but a large
part of Europe
would have been uninhabitable. Can you imagine it? A European
catastrophe.
So here was the task: who would dive
in there and open the bolt on the safety valve? They promised
them a
car, an apartment, a dacha, aid for their families until the
end of
time. They searched for volunteers. And they found them! The
boys dived,
many times, and they opened that bolt, and the unit was given
7,000
roubles. They forgot about the cars and apartments they
promised - that's
not why they dived. These are people who came from a certain
culture,
the culture of the great achievement. They were a sacrifice.
And what about the soldiers who
worked
on the roof of the reactor? Two hundred and ten military units
were
thrown at the liquidation of the fallout of the catastrophe,
which equals
about 340,000 military personnel. The ones cleaning the roof
got it
the worst. They had lead vests, but the radiation was coming
from below,
and they weren't protected there. They were wearing ordinary,
cheap
imitation-leather boots. They spent about a minute and a half,
two minutes
on the roof each day, and then they were discharged, given a
certificate
and an award - 100 roubles. And then they disappeared to the
vast peripheries
of our motherland. On the roof they gathered fuel and graphite
from
the reactor, shards of concrete and metal.
It took about 20-30 seconds to fill
a wheelbarrow, and then another 30 seconds to throw the
"garbage" off
the roof. These special wheelbarrows weighed 40 kilos just by
themselves.
So you can picture it: a lead vest, masks, the wheelbarrows,
and insane
speed.
In the museum in Kiev they have a
mould
of graphite the size of a soldier's cap; they say that if it
were real
it would weigh 16 kilos, that's how dense and heavy graphite
is. The
radio-controlled machines they used often failed to carry out
commands
or did the opposite of what they were supposed to do, because
their
electronics were disrupted by the high radiation. The most
reliable
"robots" were the soldiers. They were christened the "green
robots"
[from the colour of their uniforms]. Some 3,600 soldiers
worked on the
roof of the ruined reactor. They slept on the ground in tents.
They
were young guys.
These people don't exist any more,
just the documents in our museum, with their names.
Eduard Borisovich Korotkov
Helicopter Pilot
I was scared before I went there.
But
then when I got there the fear went away. It was all orders,
work, tasks.
I wanted to see the reactor from above, from a helicopter - to
see what
had really happened in there. But that was forbidden. On my
medical
card they wrote that I got 21 roentgen, but I'm not sure
that's right.
Some days there'd be 80 roentgen, some days 120. Sometimes at
night
I'd circle over the reactor for two hours.
I talked to some scientists. One
told
me: "I could lick your helicopter with my tongue and nothing
would happen
to me." Another said: "You're flying without protection? You
don't want
to live too long? Big mistake! Cover yourselves!" We lined the
helicopter
seats with lead, made ourselves some lead vests, but it turns
out those
protect you from one set of rays, but not from another. We
flew from
morning to night. There was nothing spectacular in it. Just
work, hard
work. At night we watched television - the World Cup was on,
so we talked
a lot about football.
I guess it must have been three
years
later. One of the guys got sick, then another. Someone died.
Another
went insane and killed himself. That's when we started
thinking.
I didn't tell my parents I'd been
sent
to Chernobyl. My brother happened to be reading Izvestia one
day and
saw my picture. He brought it to our mum. "Look," he said,
"he's a hero!"
My mother started crying.
Aleksandr Kudryagin
Liquidator
We had good jokes. Here's one: an
American
robot is on the roof for five minutes, and then it breaks
down. The
Japanese robot is on the roof for five minutes, and then
breaks down.
The Russian robot is up there two
hours!
Then a command comes in over the loudspeaker: "Private Ivanov!
In two
hours, you're welcome to come down and have a cigarette
break."
Ha-ha!
Nikolai Fomich Kalugin
Father
We didn't just lose a town, we lost
our whole lives. We left on the third day. The reactor was on
fire.
I remember one of my friends saying, "It smells of reactor."
It was
an indescribable smell.
They announced over the radio that
you couldn't take your belongings! All right, I won't take all
my belongings,
I'll take just one belonging. I need to take my door off the
apartment
and take it with me. I can't leave the door. It's our
talisman, it's
a family relic. My father lay on this door. I don't know whose
tradition
this is, but my mother told me that the deceased must be
placed to lie
on the door of his home.
I took it with me, that door - at
night,
on a motorcycle, through the woods. It was two years later,
when our
apartment had already been looted and emptied. The police were
chasing
me. "We'll shoot! We'll shoot!" They thought I was a thief.
That's how
I stole the door from my own home.
I took my daughter and my wife to
the
hospital. They had black spots all over their bodies. These
spots would
appear, then disappear. They were about the size of a
five-kopek coin.
But nothing hurt. They did some tests on them. My daughter was
six-years-old.
I'm putting her to bed, and she whispers in my ear: "Daddy, I
want to
live, I'm still little." And I had thought she didn't
understand anything.
Can you picture seven little girls
shaved bald in one room? There were seven of them in the
hospital room
... My wife couldn't take it. "It'd be better for her to die
than to
suffer like this. Or for me to die, so that I don't have to
watch any
more."
We put her on the door ... on the
door
that my father lay on. Until they brought a little coffin. It
was small,
like the box for a large doll.
I want to bear witness: my daughter
died from Chernobyl. And they want us to forget about it.
Arkady Filin
Liquidator
You immediately found yourself in
this
fantastic world, where the apocalypse met the stone age. We
lived in
the forest, in tents, 200km from the reactor, like partisans.
We were between 25 and 40; some of
us had university degrees or diplomas. I'm a history teacher,
for example.
Instead of machine guns they gave us shovels. We buried trash
heaps
and gardens. The women in the villages watched us and crossed
themselves.
We had gloves, respirators and surgical robes. The sun beat
down on
us. We showed up in their yards like demons. They didn't
understand
why we had to bury their gardens, rip up their garlic and
cabbage when
it looked like ordinary garlic and ordinary cabbage. The old
women would
cross themselves and say, "Boys, what is this - is it the end
of the
world?"
In the house the stove's on, the
lard
is frying. You put a dosimeter to it, and you find it's not a
stove,
it's a little nuclear reactor.
I saw a man who watched his house
get
buried. We buried houses, wells, trees. We buried the earth.
We'd cut
things down, roll them up into big plastic sheets. We buried
the forest.
We sawed the trees into 1.5m pieces and packed them in
Cellophane and
threw them into graves.
I couldn't sleep at night. I'd close
my eyes and see something black moving, turning over - as if
it were
alive - live tracts of land, with insects, spiders, worms. I
didn't
know any of them, their names, just insects, spiders, ants.
And they
were small and big, yellow and black, all different colours.
One of the poets says somewhere that
animals are a different people. I killed them by the ten, by
the hundred,
thousand, not even knowing what they were called. I destroyed
their
houses, their secrets. And buried them. Buried them.
Vanya Kovarov
12
I'm 12 years old and I'm an invalid.
The mailman brings two pension cheques to our house - for me
and my
grandad.
When the girls in my class found out
that I had cancer of the blood, they were afraid to sit next
to me.
They didn't want to touch me.
The doctors said that I got sick
because
my father worked at Chernobyl. And after that I was born. I
love my
father.
Ivan Nikolaevich Zhykhov
Chemical Engineer
We dug up the diseased top layer of
soil, loaded it into cars and took it to waste burial sites. I
thought
that a waste burial site was a complex, engineered
construction, but
it turned out to be an ordinary pit. We picked up the earth
and rolled
it, like big rugs. We'd pick up the whole green mass of it,
with grass,
flowers, roots. It was work for madmen.
If we weren't drinking like crazy
every
night, I doubt we'd have been able to take it. Our psyches
would have
broken down. We created hundreds of kilometres of torn-up,
fallow earth.
There was an emphasis on our being
heroes. Once a week someone who was digging really well would
receive
a certificate of merit before all the other men. The Soviet
Union's
best grave digger. It was crazy.
These
are edited excerpts from Voices
From Chernobyl, by Svetlana Alexievich, published by Dalkey
Archive
Press at £13.99.
Go to Original
The Key to Our Energy Future
By John Ritch
The Washington Post
Tuesday 26 April 2005
In the current debate over the
energy
bill, one important factor is being all but ignored: A global
renaissance
in nuclear energy is gaining momentum, and it could have
greater implications
than any or all of the other proposed methods being discussed
for dealing
with our energy problems.
Today some 440 civil nuclear
reactors,
in 30 countries comprising two-thirds of humankind, produce 16
percent
of the world's electricity. Under current plans, these nations
will
construct several hundred more reactors by 2030.
China and India will lead the way,
but the expansion will be broad-based. Nuclear power will also
extend
to new countries as diverse as Poland, Turkey, Indonesia and
Vietnam.
Meanwhile, nuclear "phaseouts" in countries such as Italy and
Germany
seem sure to be reversed.
Around the world, there is a new
realism
about nuclear energy, a recognition of its essential virtue,
which is
its capacity to deliver power cleanly, safely, reliably and on
a massive
scale. This thinking is eclipsing old-school anti-nuclear
environmentalism.
Increasingly, thoughtful
environmentalists
see anti-nuclearism as counterproductive. They worry not about
the growth
of nuclear energy but about the likelihood that it is not
growing rapidly
enough to produce the clean-energy revolution the world
urgently needs.
Carbon fuel emissions - 900 tons
each
second - continue unabated, even as science warns that we are
fast reaching
a point of irreversible global warming with consequences for
sea levels,
species extinction, epidemic disease, drought and severe
weather events
that will disrupt all civilization.
To avert climate catastrophe,
greenhouse
emissions must be reduced over the next 50 years by 60 percent
- even
as population growth and economic development are combining to
double
or triple world energy consumption.
Every authoritative energy analysis
points to an inescapable imperative: Humankind cannot
conceivably achieve
a global clean-energy revolution without a rapid expansion of
nuclear
power to generate electricity, produce hydrogen for tomorrow's
vehicles
and drive seawater-desalination plants to meet a fast-emerging
world
water crisis.
This reality requires a tenfold
increase
in nuclear energy during the 21st century. Fortunately,
advances in
technology and practice can facilitate this expansion by
meeting legitimate
public concerns:
- Safety.
In the two decades since Chernobyl, the global
nuclear industry has built an impressive safety record
that draws
on 12,000 reactor-years of practical experience. A network
of active
cooperation on operational safety now links every nuclear
power
reactor worldwide.
- Arms
Proliferation.
Illicit weapons programs of rogue regimes pose an
ever-present risk.
But strong, universal safeguards can ensure that civil
nuclear facilities
do not increase that risk. Security for the environment
and against
terrorism need not conflict.
- Cost.
Steady reductions in operational and capital costs have
already
made nuclear energy highly competitive. Once governments
begin to
impose a real price on environmental damage - through
emissions
trading or carbon taxes - the balance will tilt decisively
toward
nuclear.
- Waste.
In truth, waste is nuclear power's greatest comparative
asset. Unlike
carbon emissions, the volume is minimal and can be
reliably contained
and managed. For a half-century, the civil nuclear
industry has
safely stored and transported all end products from
electricity
generation. For long-term storage, a scientific consensus
favors
deep geological repositories. Governments worldwide must
follow
the lead of Finland, Sweden, the United States and France
by moving
to construct such sites.
The scope of the environmental
crisis
requires that governments accelerate the nuclear renaissance.
One essential
element will be a comprehensive post-Kyoto treaty on climate.
It must
include all major nations and yield a steady, long-term
contraction
in global emissions. The key is an emissions-trading mechanism
that
yields efficiency in clean-energy investment and a net flow of
investment
from North to South. This economic assistance will be the most
cost-effective
in history if it prevents the globally destructive greenhouse
emissions
that will otherwise occur in the developing world.
Another key is investment.
Full-scale
nuclear investment is still impeded by the absence of carbon
penalties,
the short-term bias of deregulated energy markets and the fact
that
21st-century nuclear reactors have not yet achieved economies
of scale.
Governments must prime the pump using start-up aids such as
loan guarantees
and tax credits for first-of-a-kind engineering costs.
We need multinational investment,
too.
Today the major U.N. development institutions reflexively
embrace unscientific
prejudice while the International Atomic Energy Agency works
alone to
promote the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Governments must
now direct
the World Bank and the U.N. Development and Environment
Programs to
pursue a clean-energy vision with nuclear power in a central
role.
Recently, leading academic
institutions
in 25 countries formed a partnership called the World Nuclear
University
to build standards for a globalizing nuclear profession. To
support
this effort, governments worldwide should marshal their own
resources
- and we must summon the great philanthropies - to supply a
global infusion
of scholarship funds for studies in peaceful nuclear science.
Today technology is spurring a
growth
in world population and energy consumption that jeopardizes
the future
of our biosphere. Wisely used, modern technology can also be
our salvation.
John
Ritch is Director General of
the World Nuclear Association. He was US Ambassador to the
International
Atomic Energy Agency and other UN agencies in Vienna from 1993
to 2001. |