After three years of drought, humanitarian aid organisations
have come to the rescue of the famine-stricken Ogaden in southeast Ethiopia.
But this disaster has little to do with nature. Rather, the famine has
been cynically staged with the aim of attracting maximum international
aid and capturing votes. by SYLVIE BRUNEL *
Drought is again affecting the Ogaden. The 3.5m Somalis who
live in this region of Ethiopia have suffered from it for three years
running. Water resources have become scarce and the land has been over-grazed;
climatic difficulties, common in the Sahel, have made the growing imbalance
between the area's capacity and utilisation all the clearer.
The Ogaden economy, directed towards the east rather than to Ethiopia,
has suffered a succession of setbacks: the war in Somalia from 1991,
a change in Saudi Arabia's sanitary regulations - depriving the region
of its traditional cattle exports - recurring droughts, occasional floods
and permanent insecurity. Last year, while the rest of Ethiopia harvested
a grain surplus, the Ogaden suffered a serious loss: the drought destroyed
90% of the crops and spread unusually far into the south. The price
of cattle has crashed while the cost of food has risen dramatically.
The death of a large part of the bovine herds from starvation signals
a breaking point.
Yet the Ethiopian authorities controlled the deep wells - still being
replenished, unlike the traditional wells managed by the clans, which
had dried up at the onset of the crisis. So they could have intervened
to make up for the lack of rain and avoid concentrations of men and
cattle around the wells. Due to high demand near sources of water, the
land is quickly grazed out.
Ethiopia is one of the few African countries where the public crisis
management system works. An early warning system was put in place in
1976 and the Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Commission (DPPC),
a legacy of the 1984-85 famine, ensures that famines are avoided. Its
results are satisfactory, thanks to security stocks that are released
on the market in case of abnormal price hikes. The DPPC was thus able
to avoid shortages, in spite of the lack of rain in the Tigray, in the
northern part of the country, Prime Minister Meles Zenawi's home province.
Preventive distribution of food, a reduction in herd size by regulating
the purchasing system as well as the implementation of the early warning
systems (EWS) would have avoided disaster. But the EWS is prevented
from operating in the pasture zones, even though they are fragile, by
restrictions of movement imposed on UN agencies and other non-governmental
organisations (NGO). In fact, the country thinks it is sufficiently
organised not to need international NGOs unless they are limited to
giving technical assistance and financial aid to the authorities. The
NGO's capacity to react in emergencies is destroyed by permanent harassment:
long approval procedures and various other hindrances, such as limiting
the number of authorised vehicles, forbidding the use of trucks, helicopters
and cell phones, limiting communications to radio exchanges, and putting
heavy taxes on incoming goods.
Insecurity hampers the development of humanitarian programmes. In 1977
military occupation of the Ogaden by Somalia unleashed an international
conflict. Today, this insecurity continues on account of numerous separatist
movements, in particular Ittihad al-Islam and the Ogaden National Liberation
Front (ONLF), both supported by Somalia. The country lives in a state
of chronic war, with constant confrontations between clans, between
the military and the rebels, and between the rebels and the civilian
militias organised by the Addis Ababa government and paid for with sacks
of food taken from international aid, mainly that of the World Food
Programme.
The Somalis are doubly penalised in Ethiopia. On the one hand, they
represent a minority in relation to the other high plateau peoples (1)
with whom they live in a state of reciprocal hostility. On the other
hand, they are an extremely divided people, partitioned into rival groups.
At the height of the drought, the antagonism between clans deprived
many families of access to food and water, particularly along the region's
main river, the Wabe Shebele.
The threat of "somalisation" of the Ogaden haunts the Ethiopian government,
which has always neglected the Somali people but covets their land.
This huge, sparsely populated space could be an ideal agricultural frontier
for an Amhara nation in search of a demographic outlet.
Geographically, the Ogaden may be barren Sahel, but it holds enormous
unexplored quantities of natural gas - 35bn cubic metres, according
to a Russian evaluation conducted in the early 1980s. In 1997 a Chinese
firm signed a contract to produce liquefied gas with the help of the
World Bank. There is even a pipeline project to Harare (Zimbabwe), where
a refinery can be built.
Brought to heel
What better way to bring this rebellious province to heel than
to organise controls around the main perennial sources of water? Only
the deep wells have retained water. Some of them belong to private owners
who charge dearly for access. Others are controlled by the Ethiopian
army. Those who want access must pledge allegiance: here as elsewhere,
those who control food and water hold the power.
In April last year the Ethiopian military forbade access to the Wabe
Shebele river, toward which thousands of families were gathering, on
the pretext that it was full of bacteria. Food distribution, organised
under army rule in the areas with the greatest population, allowed tight
control over a territory until then poorly controlled by troops with
little regard for local populations.
The authorities' take-over of the region was exacerbated by the prospect
of general elections (held in May, except in the Ogaden where they were
postponed until August). The coalition already in power was elected
by a huge majority. The elections were for Council Members in the nine
federal states - the regional legislative bodies - and for the individual
administrative regions, as well as for the House of Representatives,
the federal legislative body.
The stakes are high for Addis Ababa in the Somali region because of
the principle of self-determination adopted by the Meles Zenawi government.
In the Ogaden, the previous elections, held in 1993, had brought to
power local leaders who were greatly tempted by independence. Only by
funding "friendly" parties did the central government succeed in limiting
the damage, at the cost of an increased military presence, financed
in part by United States aid.
Last year Human Rights Watch denounced the "secret war" in the Ogaden.
The province had become a huge, closed military camp in which the army
has carried out extortion and massacres, imprisoned people, and denied
access to water. In April, at the height of the drought, the army suddenly
changed its tactics and set itself up, unexpectedly, as the good Samaritan.
It transported food and organised aid. Even if the quantities it distributed
were insufficient - and distribution methods were a far cry from those
used by real humanitarians - the aim was clear: the impact of food distribution
a few weeks from the election could only work in favour of candidates
for a federal administration that had, until then, been struggling to
impose its legitimacy.
Cashing in on the famine
The means, however, were lacking. The fratricidal trench warfare
between Ethiopia and Eritrea had been draining all the country's vital
forces since May 1998 (2), with great loss of men, materials and financial
means. Receiving international aid while rallying Ethiopians around
a national disaster was an excellent move by the regime. On the pretext
that roads and transportation infrastructure were lacking, the government
concentrated the media and aid agencies in a calm area that was well
controlled by the military. Its epicentre was the city of Gode, which
has one of this under-equipped region's few airports. All the news reports
by the world media on the "Ethiopian famine" were done in the same 50
kilometre radius - most of them in Denan, a town 40 kilometres from
Gode, where the famine was particularly visible.
Symbols of absolute desolation, the bodies of dead cows lined the road
from Gode to Denan. The cadavers were dragged along the road, carefully
aligned and straightened up as often as possible - props for the famine
display. The authorities led the westerners to the Denan cemetery to
show them a few freshly dug children's graves and criticise the international
community for its lateness in sending aid. They did not mention that,
shortly before, they were still refusing to allow any western humanitarian
aid organisation to be present.
In April Ethiopia was promised five times more food aid than had been
planned before the media coverage of the famine. Close to 900,000 tons
were promised - a considerable amount, and not tied to the cease-fire
with Eritrea, since Addis Ababa had categorically refused to give in
to such "blackmail". Crucially, this amount of aid was not founded on
the real numbers of starving people.
In March the humanitarian aid organisations hesitated to estimate the
numbers of victims. But the mission head present in the afflicted zone
estimated that about 1m people - almost a third of the Ogaden's population
- needed emergency food aid. But in early April the government announced
that 2m people had been hit by the famine. In a few days the numbers
of starving people were reported to have doubled, reaching 4m - then
doubled again to 8m. A visit by the director of the World Food Programme
(WFP), who was taken by the authorities to the northern Tigray region,
geographically opposite to the epicentre of the disaster, resulted in
an additional doubling of the estimate - now 16m people! The WFP and
Unicef, taking over from the Ethiopian government, then requested aid
for the entire northern part of the country, on the grounds of drought.
Yet in the Tigray, the British NGO Save the Children did not see any
deterioration of the food situation.
The impressive number of 16m is a dangerous extrapolation, based on
a very limited geographic reality - that of acute malnutrition in the
area surrounding Gode. It corresponds to the total number of people
living in the regions of the Horn of Africa that have suffered from
lack of rain to one degree or another.
We know, however, that people will not be equally affected. Famine sifts
through the population, selecting the most vulnerable. Nevertheless,
the call has been heard and 900,000 tons of grain have been promised.
Such a volume of aid can meet the chronic need for food in Ethiopia,
one of the 17 countries in the world said to be at "major risk". But
the starving people of the Ogaden may only receive a small part of this
aid, since the ports of Berbera and Djibouti are physically incapable
of absorbing this kind of tonnage, and the government has categorically
ruled out using Eritrean ports.
This humanitarian disaster has little to do with nature. The Ethiopian
government has cynically used the drought in the Ogaden to obtain the
maximum amount of aid in the shortest possible time.
* Geographer and author
of La faim dans le monde, comprendre pour agir, PUF, Paris, 1999
The Oromos, Amharas and Tigrayans; the latter number 3m according to
the most recent census and are themselves a minority in relation to
the Oromos, even though they control the political power.
See Jean-Louis Péninou, "Ethiopia invades Eritrea", Le Monde diplomatique,
English edition, July 2000.
Translated by Carole Beaulieu |